Folks
Between my and the TA's lisp resources, I realize that there are too many links to possible lisp interpreters you can use. I would like to make your choice easy by
suggesting that you all use the free "Lisp in a box" implementation (with Clisp module).
I just installed it on my windows XP in under 10min, and was able to
run the project 1 code. It ran flawlessly pretty much out of the box. [it is available for both windows and linux].
The environment--emacs with clisp--is the very best way to use lisp (you will get both the best ever editor in the world and the best ever language in the world; and
to get the recursion going, the best ever editor is actually written in the best-ever language (a variant of it anyways).
Finally there is a great online guide that is written around lisp-in-a-box.
Here are the links in one place:
http://common-lisp.net/project/lispbox/#windows [downloading emacs interface and clisp together --stick to clisp which is free and I checked to make sure it works]
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ (the practical common-lisp book that is written _around_ lisp-in-a-box lisp
Rao
ps: Yay yay to Lei Tang for suggesting it!
--
Subbarao Kambhampati
http://rakaposhi.eas.asu.edu
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Yes, three cheers for Lei Tang- hip hip hurray!
No really- the lisp in a box is making things a LOT easier. Now if only there something just as easy for Mac OS X :-)
I am not sure about Mac OS X. Maybe, you can check out a variant version written by the author of the tutorial of lisp in a box which can be found in :
http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/lispbox/
Try that OS X out to see if it works for Mac.
Otherwise, you can just send your question to the newsgroup:
comp.lang.lisp
Lei--
The suggestion you made for MAC OS X is amazing-- it works with MAC OS X PPC as well now.
Thanks so much!
- Kartik
Post a Comment